Friday, 6 December 2024

Comparison of EDI envelopes (X12, EDIFACT and Tradacoms)

Aspect

X12

EDIFACT

Tradacoms

Hierarchy Levels

3 Levels: Interchange, Functional Group, Transaction Set

3 Levels: Interchange, Functional Group (optional), Message

3 Levels: Transmission, Batch, Message

Interchange Header

ISA (Interchange Control Header)

UNB (Interchange Header)

STX (Start of Transmission)

Interchange Trailer

IEA (Interchange Control Trailer)

UNZ (Interchange Trailer)

END (End of Transmission)

Functional Group Header

GS (Group Header)

UNG (Group Header, optional)

BAT (Batch Header)

Functional Group Trailer

GE (Group Trailer)

UNE (Group Trailer, optional)

EOB (End of Batch)

Message Header

ST (Transaction Set Header)

UNH (Message Header)

MHD (Message Header)

Message Trailer

SE (Transaction Set Trailer)

UNT (Message Trailer)

MTR (Message Trailer)

Envelope Flexibility

Fixed, strict hierarchy

Flexible, group header optional

Simpler and flatter hierarchy

Control Numbers

ISA/IEA, GS/GE, ST/SE control numbers for tracking

UNB/UNZ and UNH/UNT control numbers

STX/END and MHD/MTR identifiers

Data Format

ASCII

ISO 9735

Fixed-width ASCII

Regions of Use

Primarily North America

Global (Europe, Asia, and others)

Primarily UK and retail industries

Main Applications

Retail, healthcare, supply chain

International trade, shipping, logistics

Retail and grocery sectors

Validation

Comprehensive control number validation

Message-level validation

Batch-level validation

Complexity

Moderate complexity, widely adopted

High complexity, globally scalable

Simple structure, industry-specific

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comparison Between EDI and API

Comparison between  EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) and API (Application Programming Interface) in the context of B2B data exchange: ...